And
in the beginning, there was Work. No society has ever existed
without it. To the archeologist digging under the hot sun for
remains of the earliest man, the presence of primitive tools is
his surest sign that the skull fragment he finds is that of a
human ancestor -- and that he (or she) worked.
Imagine
yourself a toothy, not too clever hominid, bent on becoming human.
Your hands are better proportioned and more dexterous than those
of your less nimble primate forebears. You reach down to pick up a
stick here, a stone there, knowing that a little something in the
hand will be a distinct help in attacking a wildebeest or in
opening the tough rind of a wild fruit. You happen upon a
particularly useful stick, shaped like a club, and you go and
whack a bear on the head with it.
Astonished
at your cleverness, you keep the stick and rush around to apprise
all the other cavemen what can be done with clubs. Your primal
cohabitants, obviously impressed by your creativity and
inventiveness, soon start looking for club-shaped sticks to use as
tools for whacking food. Boosted by the adulation and respect from
your peers, you go off looking for even more useful sticks and
stones. Your motivation to work is triggered not only by a need to
eat, but a newfound sense of self worth.
So
begins the story of Work.
You're
probably reminded of Fred Flintstone, the Stone Age hero of the
common working man. The popular Flintstones cartoon portrayed
primitive man as quite ingenious and inventive, creatively
bridging the gap with modern man. It is certainly true that the
long stretch of the Stone Age is wrought with a host of new
inventions -- spears, harpoons, and probably the bow and arrow,
but, regrettably there never was a Fred Flintstone.
Our
knowledge of the Stone Age is based largely on imperishable stone
tools. Most of the wood and other organic materials, including any
bear-whacking clubs, used by early man have decayed and vanished.
But the discovery of stone tools confirms that early man was a
hunter and a gatherer. And despite these fragmentary histories at
best, we know that he worked, not only for the purpose of
obtaining food, but also for the added comforts of identity,
esteem and worth. Work afforded man a role and place in society by
which others could measure his success.
These
early hunter-gatherers, like the fishermen, farmers, and crafts
workers that followed, were essentially all self-employed. They
made their own jobs. Synchronized to the rhythms of the
environment, their activity garnered an appreciation and respect
for the fruits of the natural world. For many centuries, careful
stewardship of the land was central to life and livelihood,
providing not only sustenance, but also the means to earn a
living.
But
this relationship was dismantled with the coming of the industrial
revolution and the emergence of the "job," in which work
began to be segmented into blocks of time and awarded to
strangers. The modern job was a startling new idea -- and to many
people an inhuman, risky way to work, because it meant placing
their security in someone else's hands. “I should give up all my
security to work for you?” Americans talked about the job as
"wage slavery," as contrasted to the freedom and
security of work as they knew it. The job seemed devoid of a
purpose or mission.
But
the "job" stuck, and in time brought a new vocabulary to
work: terms like bargaining, bumping and boycotting, along with
sweatshops, strikes and scabs. Labor organizations developed and
laws were enacted, institutionalizing a growing movement built on
dissatisfaction with the rewards of the job.
Although
the labor movement has receded in recent years, a pervasive sense
of "job entitlement" remains firmly entrenched in our
work psyche. We speak of each individual's right to a job, but
seldom of the individual's responsibility in creating or defining
it. And many of our organizations, in the name of free enterprise,
have devastated the earth in ways we are only beginning to know.
The natural connection between life and livelihood has been
severed.
To
be sure, future societies will look upon our principles and values
to interpret our relationship to work. What will they learn? What
will be our legacy of work? Will we bequeath an improved quality
of work life to future generations?
If
we are to build a culture of work that is recognizably more
passionate and meaningful than we now have, we, as individuals,
must rededicate ourselves to the restoration of a purpose or
mission to work, where respect for the human spirit is given the
cultural centrality it demands -- and where the connection between
work and nature remains sacred.
Madame
Chiang Kai-Shek once said, "We live in the present, we dream
of the future and we learn eternal truths from the past.” It is
in this spirit that the future of work holds the most promise,
suggesting, perhaps, that the time has come to swing the pendulum
back, to somehow reunite life and livelihood, and to savor all
that was good in the work of civilizations past. We need to go
back before we can move ahead, for we are clearly still a
"work in progress."
©
2000, Career Planning and Management, Inc., Boston,
MA. All rights reserved.
